Given recent performances and head-to-head records, Surrey Jaguars (SJ) are likely to have the upper hand in this match | Reddy Anna. Bangla Tigers Mississauga (BTM) need to improve their batting consistency to effectively challenge SJ.
Preview
Two of the top-four teams, Bangla Tigers Mississauga and Surrey Jaguars, will face off in the ongoing Global T20 Canada 2024. The game will be played at the CAA Centre in Brampton on July 31, 2024. It is a crucial match for both teams to strengthen their playoff chances.
BTM are currently third in the points table, with two wins and one defeat in their three matches, earning them four points. A win in this game will help them move to the second spot with six points and improve their net run rate.
Surrey Jaguars, on the other hand, are in fourth place with one win and one defeat, having two points. A win against BTM in this game will help them gain the second spot in the points table, surpassing the Toronto Nationals with a better net run rate.
Probable Playing XI
Bangla Tigers Mississauga:
Rahmanullah Gurbaz (wk)
D Wiese
Iftikhar Ahmed
Waseem Muhammad
Hazratullah Zazai
Shakib Al Hasan (C)
G Sidhu
Dillon Heyliger
Pargat Singh
Shoriful Islam
Ali Khan
Bench: Rayyan Pathan, Odean Smith, Tajinder Singh, F Khan, Nav Pabreja, G Bajwa, R Reddy, N Dosanjh
Surrey Jaguars:
Hamza Tariq
Shreyas Movva (wk)
MP Stoinis (C)
B McMullen
Kyle Mayers
SP Narine
Mohammad Nabi
Harmeet Singh
Virandeep Singh
BG Lister
Junaid Siddiqui
Bench: Rizwan Cheema, NS Dhaliwal, Logan van Beek, T Hinds, M Gill, P Joshi, Uday Bhagwan
Injury and Availability News
Updates will be provided as available.
Pitch Report
The average score at the CAA Centre in Brampton has been 137 runs. The track is quite balanced, with some inclination towards batters in the first innings. The first-innings average score is around 150 runs, so the captain winning the toss will likely choose to bat first to post a challenging target for the opponent.
Pace Bowling: 70%
Spin Bowling: 30%
Batting Pitch: 55%
Bowling Pitch: 45%
Average Score: 137
Comments